SIL Assessments Sydney

Supported Independent Living · NDIS · Greater Sydney

SIL Assessments Sydney

SIL funding pays for the people who support someone at home, up to 24 hours a day. Whether that funding fits the person depends almost entirely on how well the support need is evidenced. We write the occupational therapy assessment that evidence rests on, in the person’s own home, across Sydney.

✓ AHPRA-registered OTs✓ Assessed at home, day and evening✓ Reports usually in 2 to 3 weeks✓ $193.99/hr, no hidden fees
Start here

SIL funds the people, not the property

Supported Independent Living is the NDIS support category that pays for help with daily tasks at home: personal care, cooking, medication, household routine, and supervision where it is needed, up to around the clock.

SIL is one of five NDIS home and living supports, and it is the one that funds support workers. It does not fund rent, and it does not fund the building. Where the dwelling itself is the issue, that is Specialist Disability Accommodation, which is a separate decision with separate evidence. The two are so often blurred that we keep a dedicated page on SIL versus SDA and which report you need.

Because SIL can be one of the largest single supports in a plan, the NDIA looks hard at the evidence behind it. A request built on a diagnosis and a provider quote tends to stall. What a decision maker needs is a functional picture: which tasks the person can do, which they can do only with prompting or supervision, which they cannot do at all, how that changes across the day and night, and what happens when nobody is there.

A SIL decision is not really a decision about a house. It is a decision about how many hours of another human being’s time a person’s day genuinely requires.

That functional picture is an occupational therapy question, and it is exactly what our SIL assessment sets out to establish, task by task and hour by hour.

What it answers

The questions a SIL assessment has to settle

A strong SIL report is built to answer the questions a delegate will actually ask of it.

What support, at which points of the dayNot a global statement of need, but the shape of an actual day: where the morning fails without help, what holds through the afternoon, what the evening routine requires.
How much of it must be a personSome needs can only be met by a support worker. Others can be met by equipment, prompts, routine design or a housemate arrangement. The report has to separate the two honestly.
What ratio the need supportsWhether support needs to be one-to-one, or can be shared across housemates, and at which times. Shared and individual support carry very different costs, so the reasoning has to be explicit.
What the night actually requiresOvernight support is where SIL requests most often lack evidence. Whether the need is an awake worker or someone on site who can respond matters enormously, and asserting one without evidence helps nobody.
What informal support is absorbingThe parent doing the medication, the sibling doing the shopping. If the report does not name it, the funded picture assumes it continues forever.
What should trigger a reviewCapacity changes. A defensible report says what improvement or deterioration would look like and when the arrangement should be looked at again.
Failure patterns

Why SIL requests come back without funding

Support coordinators send us requests that have stalled. The same six problems account for most of them, and none of them mean the person does not need the support.

  • The evidence describes a diagnosis, not a dayClinical letters establish the condition. A SIL decision needs to know what the condition does to Tuesday: which tasks happen, which do not, and who is currently making the difference.
  • The ratio is asserted rather than reasoned“Requires 1:1 support” appears as a conclusion with nothing underneath it. A delegate reading that has no way to agree, so the safest available decision is to ask for more evidence or fund less.
  • Overnight need has no overnight evidenceThe request seeks active overnight support, but every piece of evidence was gathered between 10am and 3pm. Nothing in the file says what actually happens at 2am, or what would happen if nobody were there.
  • Informal support is invisible, so the need looks smaller than it isA family member is quietly doing two hours of prompting, supervision and rescue every day. Nobody wrote it down, so the assessed need is missing two hours a day of genuine support.
  • Alternatives were never addressedThe file is silent on whether assistive technology, home modifications or an ILO arrangement could meet part of the need. Silence reads as “not considered”, and the question comes back.
  • The quote and the evidence tell different storiesThe provider’s proposed roster describes one level of support and the functional evidence describes another. When the two documents disagree, the evidence is redone or the funding reflects the lower one.
Method

Why we assess the day rather than ask about it

Interviews matter, but SIL decisions turn on consistency, and consistency cannot be established from a conversation.

The same person, two kinds of evidence
What an interview recordsWhat in-home observation establishes
“I can cook simple meals.”
A meal happens when someone else starts it. Alone, the kettle is the ceiling, and dinner is toast or nothing.
“Medication is fine, I have a Webster pack.”
The pack works because a parent hands it over each morning. Two consecutive missed days when that person was away.
“I keep the unit reasonably tidy.”
One room is maintained. The kitchen and bathroom show weeks of accumulated tasks that were started and abandoned.
“Nights are okay.”
The person wakes disoriented most nights, and safety currently depends on a family member sleeping in the next room.

Neither column is dishonest. People describe their best days, adapt around their difficulties, or genuinely do not see the support they receive. That is why our SIL assessments are grounded in observation in the home, at more than one time of day where the pattern requires it, corroborated by the people who see the whole week.

The full method, including our evidence standard and how we weigh observed evidence against reported evidence, is published on our assessment methodology page.

How we think about it

The three levers, applied to a SIL decision

Every assessment we write works the same three levers. In SIL, the honest question is how much of the need can be met without a rostered worker, because that is the question the delegate will ask.

1

Change the task

Routine design, task breakdown, visual sequences and prompting systems that turn an unachievable task into an achievable one. Where this works, it converts hours of assistance into minutes of set-up.

2

Change the environment

Equipment and home modifications that remove the need for hands-on help: a safe kitchen, an accessible bathroom, technology that prompts and monitors. What cannot be modified points towards housing questions instead.

3

Build the capacity

Skills that can genuinely be developed, with support that steps down as they are. And, stated plainly, the needs where capacity will not change and support must simply be there, because pretending otherwise produces plans that fail.

Working the levers first is not about minimising support. It is what makes the remaining support defensible. A report that recommends 24/7 support without showing why less would not work invites the question. A report that shows the levers were applied, and states exactly what still requires a person, answers it before it is asked.

Our assessment

How a Youcentric SIL assessment runs

1

Read the file before the visit

Existing reports, plan goals, previous requests and, where one exists, the proposed roster. We are looking for what is already evidenced and what is genuinely missing, so the assessment adds rather than repeats.

2

Assess where the support will happen

In the current home, or the proposed one where a move is planned. Kitchens, bathrooms, medication storage, entry and exit: the environment is half the SIL question, and none of it is visible from a clinic.

3

Observe tasks, not answers

We watch how the person actually manages meals, self-care, medication and household tasks, including where they start well and lose the thread. Prompting need is invisible in an interview and obvious in a kitchen.

4

Cover the parts of the day we cannot see

Evenings, nights and weekends are corroborated through the people who are there: family, current support workers, and where relevant a second visit at a different time of day.

5

Name the informal support

We specifically quantify what family and friends are doing, because it is real support meeting a real need, it is usually fragile, and if it goes unrecorded the funded arrangement is built on it silently continuing.

6

Apply standardised measures

Chosen for the person and the question: WHODAS 2.0 for global functioning, the Lawton IADL Scale for domestic and community tasks, the COPM for the person’s own priorities, and where intellectual disability is central, the Vineland-3 or ABAS-3.

7

Write it to the standard we publish

Every recommendation names the evidence it rests on, says where that evidence came from, and states what happens without the support. A recommendation that cannot meet all three does not go in the report.

The deliverable

What the SIL report puts in a delegate’s hands

A support map of the actual dayMorning, daytime, evening and overnight described separately, with the support type each requires: hands-on assistance, prompting, supervision, or availability to respond.
Ratio reasoning a delegate can followWhere one-to-one support is recommended, the report shows why shared support would fail at those times. Where shared support is workable, it says so, because that credibility protects the rest of the report.
The overnight case, made properlyWhat happens at night now, what would happen with nobody there, and the specific evidence behind the recommended overnight arrangement.
The levers, worked throughWhich needs equipment, modifications or routine design could meet, which they could not, and therefore what genuinely remains for funded support to do.
Informal support, named and quantifiedWho currently does what, how many hours it amounts to, how sustainable it is, and what the arrangement looks like if it stops.
Standardised results in contextScores from the WHODAS 2.0, Lawton IADL and other measures reported with their interpretation and set alongside what was observed, never left to speak for themselves.

The report is written to feed the evidence a support coordinator assembles for a home and living request, and to sit consistently beside the roster of care your chosen provider develops. We do not write the roster, and we do not provide SIL services, which is exactly why our evidence is independent.

Worked example

How a stalled overnight request gets rebuilt

Worked example, not a real client. This is a constructed scenario showing how we would approach a common referral. It does not describe a real person or a real assessment.

The situation

A man in his late twenties living with an intellectual disability shares a house with two other participants. Daytime support is working, but the provider has proposed moving from a sleepover arrangement to an active overnight worker, and the NDIA has asked for functional evidence to support the change. The only overnight information in the file is an incident log kept by the provider.

What we would do

Assess him at the house, including an evening visit that covers the routine from dinner through to settling for the night. Review the incident log entry by entry, looking at what actually happened overnight, how often, and what response each event genuinely required. Speak separately, with consent, to the sleepover workers and to his mother, who stays over when shifts cannot be filled. Apply the ABAS-3 and the WHODAS 2.0, and map the overnight pattern across a representative month rather than a single week.

What the report would set out

Whether the overnight events require a worker who is awake, or a worker who can be woken; how often each type of response has actually been needed; what part of the pattern could be addressed by environmental changes, such as sensor lighting and a safer path to the bathroom; and the specific consequences, evidenced from the record, of having nobody able to respond. If the evidence supported a sleepover rather than an active overnight worker, the report would say so, with the same reasoning.

Why that evidence would hold up

Because every element a delegate has to weigh is answered from observation and record rather than assertion: the frequency is counted, the response type is analysed, the alternatives are addressed, and the consequence of no support is stated. A decision maker can disagree with a report like that, but they cannot say the question was left unanswered.

Honest limits

What a SIL assessment is not

Knowing when this is the wrong tool saves participants money and time, so we say it plainly.

It is not a funding decisionSIL funding is decided by the NDIA against its own criteria, and no assessment can guarantee an outcome. What an assessment controls is whether the decision is made on complete evidence.
It is not a roster of careThe roster is developed with your chosen SIL provider. Our report is the independent functional evidence the roster should be consistent with, which is a different document with a different author for good reason.
It is not always the right requestWhere the real question is who someone lives with rather than rostered hours, an ILO assessment may fit better. Where support needs sit within daily living skills, a daily living assessment may be enough. We tell you which before you book.
It is not an SDA argumentIf the dwelling itself is the barrier, that is an SDA assessment, with its own evidence requirements. One report trying to do both jobs usually does neither well.
We do not provide SIL servicesWe are an independent occupational therapy provider. We hold no stake in which SIL provider is chosen or how many hours are funded, and our reports read that way.
Registration status, stated plainlyWe work with plan-managed and self-managed participants, who are free to use unregistered providers. If the participant is NDIA-managed, we will say so up front rather than after a booking.
The bigger picture

Where SIL sits among the five home and living supports

SIL is one of five NDIS home and living support types, and requests stall when the wrong one is asked for. The full picture lives on our NDIS home and living assessments hub.

SupportWhat it funds
SILThe support workers who help with daily life at home, up to 24/7. This page.
SDAThe dwelling itself, for people with extreme functional impairment or very high support needs. See SDA assessments.
ILOA tailored package built around who the person lives with, mixing formal and informal support. See ILO assessments or our SIL vs ILO guide.
MTAInterim housing while waiting for a long-term arrangement, typically up to 90 days.
STAShort term accommodation and respite, including planned breaks for carers.

Support types and their scope are set by the NDIA and can change. Whether any support is funded in an individual plan is decided by the NDIA against its reasonable and necessary criteria. Confirm the current position with your planner or support coordinator.

Where we assess

SIL assessments across Greater Sydney

We are a mobile team and assess in the home the support will actually happen in. There is no clinic to visit.

FAQs

SIL assessments: your questions

What is a SIL assessment, in one sentence?
It is an occupational therapy assessment that establishes, from observation and evidence, how much support a person needs to live in their home, at what times, in what form and at what ratio, so a funding decision can be made on function rather than assertion.
How is a SIL assessment different from a functional capacity assessment?
A functional capacity assessment establishes the whole functional picture across every life domain. A SIL assessment goes deeper on one question: the support required to live at home, hour by hour, including ratios and overnight arrangements. Where a recent FCA exists we build on it rather than redoing it.
Who writes the roster of care?
Your chosen SIL provider develops the roster of care with you. We deliberately do not write rosters: our job is the independent functional evidence the roster should be consistent with. When the two documents agree, requests move faster. When they disagree, the evidence usually has to be redone. We explain the document in our roster of care guide.
Do you provide SIL services or housing?
No. We are an independent occupational therapy service. We do not operate SIL houses, employ support workers or hold vacancies, so our assessment carries no interest in which provider is chosen or how many hours are funded.
Can a SIL assessment recommend less support than someone currently receives?
Yes, and honesty here matters. If the evidence shows part of the need could be met by equipment, modifications or a different arrangement, the report says so, because a report that only ever argues upwards stops being believed. What we will never do is understate a need the evidence supports.
What evidence is needed for overnight support?
Evidence about the night: what happens, how often, what response it requires, and what the consequence of no response would be. That usually means incident records, corroboration from the people who are there overnight, and where the pattern justifies it, assessment at different times of day. Daytime-only evidence is the most common gap in overnight requests.
Are you a registered NDIS provider?
No. We work with plan-managed and self-managed participants, who can use unregistered providers. Agency-managed participants generally cannot, and we will tell you that at referral rather than after an assessment is booked.
What does a SIL assessment cost, and how long does it take?
Assessments are charged at the NDIS occupational therapy rate of $193.99 per hour for 2026-27, based on the time the assessment and report take, and we quote the expected hours before starting. The written report is usually delivered within 2 to 3 weeks of the final visit. Referrals are acknowledged within 2 business days.
Will the assessment get SIL funding approved?
No assessment can promise that, and you should be wary of anyone who suggests otherwise. SIL funding is decided by the NDIA against its reasonable and necessary criteria. What a proper assessment does is make sure the decision is made on complete, honest, well-organised evidence rather than on gaps.
Get started

Refer for a SIL assessment

Send a referral or an enquiry below, or call 1300 316 664. If a home and living request has already stalled, send us what was submitted and we will tell you honestly what is missing.

Evidence for the hours that actually need a person

Talk to our mobile OT team about a SIL assessment anywhere in Greater Sydney. We come to the home the support will happen in.

Make a referral or call 1300 316 664